The Need for Consistency in Nomenclature of MSMEs in India

---

The current landscape for categorizing micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs) in India is fraught with inconsistencies that not only affect policy clarity but also have real-world implications for business operations and financial services. A glaring example of this issue is how merchant categorizations are handled. For instance, while only about five million merchants earning over Rs 20 lakhs are being classified as large merchants by certain industry players, the official MSME threshold—based on turnover and investment—paints a very different picture.

Challenges in Merchant Classification

This inconsistency creates confusion across sectors:

• Policy Implementation: Government policies tailored for MSMEs may not be effectively reaching all intended beneficiaries if the definitions vary across different departments and financial institutions.
• Financial Services: Banks and payment gateways use these categorizations to determine fees, credit limits, and other financial services. When the categorization is inconsistent, small merchants could end up paying fees meant for larger players or vice versa.
• Regulatory Impact: As highlighted in a recent article by Business Standard, industry bodies like PCI are urging the PMO to levy MDR (merchant discount rate) on UPI and RuPay debit cards. Such initiatives depend critically on the clarity of merchant definitions, as an ambiguous classification could lead to unfair practices or misaligned policy benefits.

Why Consistency Matters

• Enhanced Transparency: A unified nomenclature would bring transparency to the regulatory framework. Both the government and the private sector would benefit from a clear understanding of who qualifies as an MSME.
• Better Resource Allocation: With clear definitions, policies can be more effectively targeted. Financial incentives, subsidies, and support measures would reach the intended audience without leakage or misclassification.
• Market Confidence: Consistency in definitions fosters trust among investors, service providers, and MSMEs themselves. A standardized framework can drive innovation and growth by ensuring that all stakeholders operate on a level playing field.

The Way Forward

To bridge these gaps, stakeholders across the board—from policy makers to payment service providers—must work towards:

• Harmonizing Definitions: Developing a common set of criteria for MSME classification that is adopted uniformly across all sectors.
• Stakeholder Dialogue: Engaging in industry-wide discussions to ensure that all relevant parties (including banks, regulatory bodies, and business associations) are on the same page.
• Periodic Review: Establishing a mechanism for the periodic review and update of these definitions in line with evolving economic realities and market dynamics.

In conclusion, while the push for regulatory measures such as those suggested by PCI indicates a proactive approach in managing the digital payments landscape, it also underscores the need for a consistent and transparent definition of MSMEs. This consistency is not just a matter of semantics—it is crucial for ensuring fairness, promoting growth, and enhancing the overall business ecosystem in India.

By aligning definitions across sectors, India can foster an environment where every enterprise gets the support it truly deserves.

---

Explore our other Posts

---

Our Services

---

---

About Us

---