Research Design for Faculty–PhD Scholars: Aligning Academic Rigor with Real-World Schedules

---

Your research design for faculty-scholars determines not just the academic validity of your dissertation—but also how realistic it is to execute within your faculty workload. As a teaching scholar juggling classes, committees, and deadlines, the key is to select a design that fits both your research question and your available hours per week.

Adapted from Ankit Gupta’s practitioner guide on research design for time-bound PhD scholars, this blog post offers a practical decision-making framework that keeps you on track without compromising scholarly standards.

---

🎯 What Is Research Design (And Why Faculty Must Be Strategic)

Research design refers to the structured plan that guides how you collect, analyze, and interpret data to answer your research question. But for faculty scholars, it also has a second role:

A research design is a time-management contract with your future self.

Choose one that over-promises on method complexity, and you’ll stall. Choose one that under-delivers on depth, and reviewers will push back.

---

🧩 The Five Common Designs (With Time-Feasibility Ratings)

Design Type	Description	Time Demand	Faculty Feasibility
Cross-Sectional	Snapshot of variables at one point in time	Low	✅ Excellent
Longitudinal	Same data points collected at multiple times	High	🔶 Moderate–Challenging
Case Study	In-depth study of a bounded system	Medium	✅ Good with focus
Quasi-Experimental	Pre-post without random assignment	High	🔶 Moderate
Experimental	Randomized controlled intervention	Very High	❌ Rarely feasible

✏️ Tip: Cross-sectional and focused case studies offer the best balance between academic depth and execution feasibility during teaching semesters.

---

🕒 Time-Blocking Your Design Path: A Weekly Template

Once you’ve selected a design, map it to weekly research blocks you can realistically protect:

Phase	Suggested Weekly Block	Duration
Proposal & IRB Draft	Sat 8–10 AM (2x/week)	3–4 weeks
Instrument Design	Wed 6–8 PM	2 weeks
Data Collection	Fri–Sat slots (in batches)	3–6 weeks
Data Cleaning	Tues 7–8 PM + Sat morning	2–3 weeks
Analysis	Mon/Wed evenings	4 weeks
Chapter Writing	Early AM weekend sessions	4–6 weeks

Use a scheduling tool like Trello, Notion, or Google Calendar to plot these out alongside your teaching timetable.

---

🔍 Design Questions to Ask Before Committing a research design

1. What kind of claim am I trying to make?
   • If “how” or “what” → Consider case study or descriptive survey.
   • If “why” or “does X cause Y” → Consider quasi-experimental (only if time allows).
2. Can I access or collect all the data in one semester?
   • If not, consider a design that allows secondary data use or compresses timelines.
3. How will I analyze it, and do I already know how?
   • Avoid methods that require steep learning curves (e.g., structural equation modeling) if you\’re mid-semester.
4. Does the design match the ethics load I can handle?
   • If ethics approval will be time-consuming, lean on archival or anonymous survey data.

---

⚙️ Tools to Implement Designs Faster

Tool Type	Suggested Options
Survey Platforms	Google Forms, KoboToolbox, REDCap
Case Study Tools	Zotero for source capture, NVivo for coding
Analysis Software	R, SPSS, Jamovi, Excel (for cross-sectional)
IRB Preparation	Templates in Overleaf or Word, DMPTool

---

🧠 Final Thought

The best research design isn’t the most complex—it’s the one you can implement without sacrificing your teaching or your sanity. By aligning your design choice with your available time, ethics constraints, and existing skill set, you safeguard both your progress and your peace of mind.

“You don’t need to pause your teaching to do a PhD—you need a research design that works alongside it.”

Choose wisely. Plan proactively. And make your design a tool that empowers—not overwhelms—you.

---

Explore more ethical research hacks for professors pursuing a PhD in India on our Ethical PhD Research Hacks for Faculty guide page