Approval for faculty research is required when conducting study among your own students or departmental colleagues and requires extra care—and formal clearance from your Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC) or Institutional Review Board (IRB). This step-by-step guide, tailored for Indian professors, helps you navigate protocol drafting, submission, and common ethical pitfalls so you can secure approval smoothly and uphold the highest standards of research integrity.
1. Drafting a Clear Ethics Protocol when applying for approval for faculty research
Your IEC application must be crystal-clear about roles, populations, and safeguards:
- Identify Roles & Populations
- Researcher: “I, Dr. X, Associate Professor, Department of Y, ABC University, will serve as principal investigator.”
- Participants: “Undergraduate students enrolled in Course X during the Spring 2025 semester.”
- Define Objectives & Methods
- Objective Statement: “To assess students’ learning preferences in hybrid instruction.”
- Methodology: “An anonymous online survey comprising 15 Likert-scale items and two open-ended questions.”
- Preventing Coercion
- Neutral Recruitment: “A departmental administrative assistant (not the course instructor) will distribute the survey link via institutional email.”
- Private Completion: “Participants will access the survey off-campus using a secure link; no classroom time will be used.”
- Voluntariness Assurance: “Participation has zero impact on course grades, as clearly stated in all recruitment materials.”
- Supplementary Documents
- Participant-Information Sheet: Explains study purpose, procedures, risks/benefits, and voluntary nature.
- Informed-Consent Form: Separately hosted online, requiring a checkbox (“I agree”) before survey start.
- Data Management Plan: Details how raw data will be stored on secure university servers, anonymization steps, retention period (e.g., 5 years), and destruction protocol.
2. Understanding the IEC/IRB Timeline when considering approval for faculty research
Most Indian universities follow a quarterly IEC schedule. Plan ahead:
| Submission Window | Meeting & Decision Timeline |
|---|---|
| 1 April | Review meeting by ~1 May → decision by 15 May |
| 1 July | Review meeting by ~1 August → decision by 15 August |
| 1 October | Review meeting by ~1 November → decision by 15 November |
| 1 January (if applicable) | Review by ~1 February → decision by 15 February |
Tip: Account for possible revisions—if the IEC requests clarifications, you may need an additional 2–4 weeks.
3. Submission Checklist
Before hitting “Submit,” ensure you have:
- Cover Letter: Briefly stating your faculty role, study purpose, and request for expedited review (if small-risk).
- Protocol Document (as above).
- Participant-Information Sheet (plain language, bilingual if necessary).
- Informed-Consent Form (with checkboxes and digital signature fields).
- Data Management Plan (secure storage, anonymization, access control).
- Recruitment Materials (sample email/SMS script or in-class announcement text).
- Curriculum Vitae (your academic profile).
- Conflict-of-Interest Declaration (disclosing dual role as instructor and researcher).
4. Ethics Pitfalls to Avoid
| Pitfall | Why It’s a Problem |
|---|---|
| Using attendance rolls for recruitment | Leaks student identities and creates pressure to participate. |
| Offering extra credit or mandatory tasks | Coerces participation and skews voluntariness. |
| Leaving identifiable details in spreadsheets | Risks confidentiality breaches if files are shared or hacked. |
| In-class recruitment by instructor | Conveys implicit compulsion; undermines free choice. |
| Vague data-retention statements | IEC requires precise timelines for data destruction to protect participant privacy. |
Quick Fixes:
- Always collect data via anonymous online forms.
- Use generic group emails—no personal identifiers.
- Offer non-academic incentives (e.g., participation certificate) rather than grade-related rewards.
5. Best Practices for Ongoing Ethical Compliance
- Maintain an Audit Trail: Log all IEC communications, version-stamped documents, and dates of consent.
- Periodic Ethics Refresher: If your study spans multiple semesters, re-affirm consent at agreed intervals.
- Unbiased Analysis: Separate your dual roles—delegate preliminary data handling to a research assistant not enrolled in the course.
- Transparent Reporting: In your dissertation and publications, include an ethics statement noting IEC approval number and date.
Final Thoughts
Securing IEC/IRB approval for research involving your own students or colleagues demands careful protocol design, transparent consent processes, and rigorous data safeguards. By following this guide—drafting a thorough protocol, respecting submission timelines, and avoiding common pitfalls—you’ll uphold ethical standards, protect your participants, and strengthen the credibility of your research.
“Ethical rigor is the cornerstone of scholarly trust—start with clear protocols and maintain vigilance throughout your study.”
Explore more ethical research hacks for professors pursuing a PhD in India on our Ethical PhD Research Hacks for Faculty guide page
Discover more from Ankit Gupta
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.